November 17, 2009
There is a very big problem that goes beyond the dead and wounded
at Fort Hood. The jihadist "broke" his oath of service, but
what was the oath worth before he started killing kafirs,
unbelievers? Major Hasan swore:
I, Nidal Hasan, do
solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the
Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or
domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;
that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations
or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge
the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me
God.
The value of an oath is determined by someone's
ethics. So, what are Islamic ethics? Like all aspects of Islam, its
ethics are found in the Koran,
the Sira
(Mohammed's biography) and the Hadith
(his traditions). The Golden Rule is not in these texts. Instead,
Islam has dualistic ethics, one set of rules for Muslims and one set
for kafirs (non-Muslims). This means that Islam dictates brotherhood
between Muslims, but not Muslims and kafirs.
The Koran defines
kafirs. The word "unbeliever" does not remotely carry the
meaning of kafir. A kafir is less than human. The word "kafir"
is the worst word in the human language. Kafirs can be hated,
assassinated, deceived, enslaved, robbed, plotted against, raped,
tortured, mocked and demeaned in every way.
Mohammed
repeatedly advised Muslims to deceive the kafir in order to advance
Islam. Deceiving kafirs is Sunna, in the way of Mohammed, the perfect
Muslim. A Muslim is to tell the truth to another brother Muslim, but,
if it will advance Islam, they can deceive the kafir. Does this mean
that a Muslim deceives kafirs all the time? Of course not, but if it
advances Islam, deception is ethical.
Mohammed said: war is
deception. Who is the war with? Kafirs are the only enemy of Islam.
Mohammed was at a state of permanent war with them. During the last 9
years of his life, he launched and led a violent event on the average
of every 6 weeks. He employed deception against the kafirs again and
again. Deception is Sunna.
Jihad against the kafir is Sunna.
Jihad is also successful. In brief: Mohammed preached the religion of
Islam for 13 years in Mecca. He was driven out of Mecca and went to
Medina. In Medina he became a politician and a warrior. Islam then
grew from a religion to a political force, and Mohammed died without
an enemy left standing. Jihad brought him total success.
Jihad
can be any action or word that brings pressure against the kafir.
Jihad is by the sword, pen, speech and money. A jihadist does not
have to kill kafirs. This means that deception, jihad, can be
practiced in many areas to advance Islam. For instance, a Muslim
translator or FBI agent can "shade" their work to conceal
facts from the kafirs. And what if a Muslim in his role of translator
or agent is caught concealing or deceiving, what will our leaders do?
Nothing. Why? There is no one in leadership capacity that knows the
doctrine and history of political Islam that has shown any knowledge
to the public. Our leaders are willfully ignorant about Islam.
The
question is: what is the worth of an oath of office from anyone who
practices deception when it advances his agenda?
Let us look
further at his oath: "all enemies, foreign or domestic".
Major Hasan is a Muslim and a Muslim is a brother to all other
Muslims and an enemy of the kafir. Why would any Muslim defend
America from an Islamic threat? His true allegiance forbids this.
Muslims owe their alliance to the umma, the Muslim community, not to
a kafir nation.
Why would Hasan protect the Constitution? The
Bill of Rights offers all peoples freedom of religion and freedom of
speech. Islamic law, Sharia law, denies these rights to any human. An
apostate of Islam can be killed and freedom of speech is specifically
denied. For instance, Mohammed or the Koran may not be
criticized.
Major Hasan, as a Muslim, is not a friend of any
kafir soldier since there are 14 verses in the Koran that command a
Muslim not to be a friend of a kafir. As a Muslim, he does not
protect the Constitution, swore a meaningless oath, believes that his
fellow soldiers are kafirs (less than human), serves the umma before
our civilization and deceives kafirs when it advances Islam. He also
believes that jihad, in all of its forms, is the true relationship
between Muslims and kafirs.
So far we have only examined the
military side of Islamic service, but this applies to FBI, police,
Homeland Security, fire department, any other government service and
citizenship. The doctrine of Islam makes a Muslim's oath meaningless
when made to kafirs.
Houston, we have a problem.
Bill Warner, CSPI
Permalink
copyright
(c) CBSX, LLC
politicalislam.com
Use and distribute as you wish; do not edit and give us credit.
|